Docs/clarify static lease register #8028
Conversation
| @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ | |||
| <type>checkbox</type> | |||
| <help> | |||
| <
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Static mappings are not leases. IP addresses are more or less implied for DNS to resolve but clarifying it in the first sentence wouldn’t hurt I suppose for all those who do read…
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does DHCP static mapping which doesn't contain a static ip will not be registered sound more accurate ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You want to make it affirmative:
… static mappings with an IP address will be registered…
AdSchellevis
force-pushed
the
master
branch
5 times, most recently
from
6586a65 to
607e32a
Compare
|
timeout |
|
My bad sorry, i had other thing rise and completely forgot about this.... |
|
@Vaarlion no worries. appreciate the PR and discussion yet sometimes we also have to discuss and wait for similar reports for these types of suggestions.. sometimes documentation also makes sense.. here it looks like it's ok as is. |
Add some documentation to clarify #7990
I could not run the test on my computer, the makefile being for BSD system.
I'm hopping for an internal CI on your side ?